On 1/8/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for a first SNAPSHOT build, If it is allowed. It would allow me to better prepare the first release of ivymakeclipse based on the new package names. By the way, what will happen to ivy+svn hosted on sourceforge in the project ivytools?
I don't know, the original author (Scott Haug from jobster.com) has no longer continued development. So I think that if somebody want to make the update, contribution is welcome. Xavier Gilles
> -----Original Message----- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 12:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: package rename > > Hi All, > > I finally found time to do the refactoring of package names. > Please use the current trunk version as basis for further > patch submission. > > Then antlib.xml is put both at org.apache.ivy.ant and > fr.jayasoft.ivy.antduring packaging (in the jar target of the > build.xml), for backward compatibility of build scripts using Ivy. > > I've also tried to use apache as organisation instead of > jayasoft as often as possible. What still need to be done is > test tutorials, and rewrite the documentation accordingly if > we want to see apache as organisation instead of jayasoft in > the shell and files captures. If anybody has some time to > take even only one tutorial, it would be very helpful. But > before we need to produce an ivy snapshot version to use for > those tutorials, so that the branding used within Ivy (like > the web site) is correct. Self building Ivy with this > snapshot version would also be a good thing, to remove the > fr.jayasoft.ivy.ant antlib in Ivy build file. > > So one question: Is it allowed to put a snapshot version of > Ivy (i.e. not a > release) on the Ivy web site here at the incubator (in > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/download/latest/ivy.jar for > instance, to follow conventions previously used at jayasoft)? > > - Xavier >
