That release is the problem! VFS is splitted into 2 parts:
commons-vfs-1.0.jar and commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar
(see the new on http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/vfs/ )

The sandbox jar contains the webdav functionality, which is needed to compile 
ivy (webdav).
The first jar is available on the apache download site and ibiblio. The sandbox 
jar isn't available: it isn't on apache, it isn't on ibiblio. Also, no nightly 
build is available neither. If the sandbox jar was availabe somewhere, there 
wasn't a problem. If you just change the revision of the VFS dependency in 
ivy.xml to "1.0", you'll notice that ivy doesn't compile any longer.

The snapshot used at the moment is rather old and contains both the core and 
the sandbox part. Gump tries to use the latest VFS code, which is splitted into 
core and sandbox. But since sandbox isn't available, gump cannot compile ivy. 
But anyway, we should also try to use this VFS 1.0 release instead of a VFS 
snapshot.

Other solutions are:
- place the commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar somewhere accessible through http (but 
this won't solve the gump problems)
- remove the webdav related code from ivy (which is actually a workaround to 
make VFS work with http-client-3).

Maarten


----- Original Message ----
From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:08:43 AM
Subject: Re: package rename

Guys, is it relevant/helpful that commons-vfs-1.0 was
released recently?

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-announce&m=116750017315311&w=2

-Matt

--- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 1/9/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've fixed the problem on my local machine.
> > I've manually created the
> commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar and added it to the
> > ivy project. This is necessary because the
> commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jarisn't available as
> download.
> >
> > Is it ok if I put this jar in the ivy SVN?
> 
> 
> I don't know for legal stuff or things like that,
> but I'm not fan of putting
> dependency jar in SVN. Hey, that's why I wrote Ivy
> :-) I'd prefer storing it
> on a web site, as is done for current version of vfs
> used in Ivy (a nightly
> build). But maybe there's an issue with gump?
> 
> Xavier
> 
> regards,
> > Maarten
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 10:14:56 PM
> > Subject: Re: package rename
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I didn't let gump send mails to ivy-commits yet. I
> wanted to wait untill
> > the ivy gump build was succesfull to avoid all
> these gump mails telling Ivy
> > couldn't be build. But if you don't mind getting
> all these mails, I'll
> > change it.
> >
> > One major problem at the moment which is blocking
> a successfull build is
> > the "VFS sandbox"-dependency which isn't available
> in gump yet.
> >
> > Maarten
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 2:52:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: package rename
> >
> >
> > On a related note, what is the gump status? I see
> that gump mails go to
> > maarten, instead of the group. That should be
> changed to go to ivy-dev
> > or ivy-commits.
> >
> > I have some gump projects that run off a snapshot
> of gump 1.4.1 in my
> > own SCM repository. Is it time to move to SVN_HEAD
> gump? How stable has
> > gump been with Ivy builds so far?
> >
> > -steve
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to