+1, I don't see the purpose of maintaining ivyrep when we have ibiblio pom, and if it is not maintained, it should not be used.
Gilles > -----Original Message----- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 14 mars 2007 9:38 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Ivyrep > > Hi, > > Ivy is still packaged with the ivyrep resolver, which is even used by the > default settings. The problem is that the official ivy repository is no > more > maintained, and I think that people starting using Ivy now would prefer > using the maven2 repository with their poms, instead of what can be found > in > the small ivyrep. Another problem is conflictual namespaces, because > maven2 > and ivyrep do not share the same naming conventions, it makes it harder to > use the two together (even if Ivy namespace feature makes it possible). > > So I think we should better use a maven 2 resolver (i.e. ibiblio with > m2compatible set to true) in the default settings as the default public > resolver, and deprecate the use of ivyrep without specifying the root. > > What do you think? > > - Xavier
