On 3/19/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote: > I've just checked in a build.xml doing the packaging trick, hope it will > fix > your gump build. thank you? > > - Xavier > > Sorry for the trouble, No, this is exactly the kind of success that Gump is designed for: to catch a regression on an OSS project, before you even think about releasing it. We have just managed to identify and fix a problem before it hit the field -which is why any project that can build under Gump, should be registered under gump. Its a lot easier to fix a regression when it went in the previous week, than when it only shows up in shipping code, because that means it takes a whole release cycle to get the fix in, and it runs the risk of breaking somebody else if they actually depend on the regression's behaviour
Agreed, but I even prefer avoiding the break :-) But you're right, this continuous integration is really a good thing, it adds even more tests to Ivy, which is really good! - Xavier -Steve
