hi xavier, the reason why i made this haltonunresolved is because how i wrote the code, it only halts on unresolved, and does not halt on a general failure.
i did this because i though the user should have the choice of NOT failing on non-resolve (seems like a valid use case), but still failing on a general error. however, i did not add the haltonfailure feature in the patch. i would suggest leaving haltonunresolved, and also adding haltonfailure, which would default to true. Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jeffrey, I'm not sure if you follow the ivy-dev mailing list or not, but we'd need your opinion about IVY-475. Could you check this thread: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r532027---in--incubator-ivy-core-trunk%3A-CHANGES.txt-doc-doc-use-install.html-src-java-org-apache-ivy-ant-IvyInstall.java-test-java-org-apache-ivy-ant-IvyInstallTest.java-tf3641359.html Thanks, Xavier -- Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
