On 6/21/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I do the same for my Ant builds at the moment (but for another reason
though).
But I can't configure my IvyDE to use a cache somewhere inside my project.


Maybe that's something that need to be solved? We already have a couple of
issues about relative paths in Ivy, maybe in IvyDE we should  have better
path handlings. Having a variable set to the workspace location and another
to the project location. Shouldn't be too difficult. Another thing asked
since a pretty long time is to be able to define Ivy variables in IvyDE.
Maybe it's time to implement this?

Xavier

--
Maarten

----- Original Message ----
From: Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:48:44 AM
Subject: Re: default cache location

What I do for my projects (or group of projects) is to place the cache
in the project directory structure.  I found it to be the best way to
avoid caching issues.

That said, my preference would be to not bother for the 2.0 release,
and come in a 2.1 with a wonderfull cache managment.

Gilles

2007/6/21, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 6/21/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using Ivy 1.4 and Ivy 2.0 on the same machine. The caches of 1.4and
> > 2.0 are not compatible with each other, so I have to change the cache
> > location for all my projects using Ivy 2.0 manually. Maybe we should
> > change the default cache location of Ivy 2.0 to ${user.home}/.ivy2
?  This
> > would allow the usage of both Ivy 1.4 and Ivy 2.0 on the same machine
with
> > the default settings...
>
>
> Why not. But if we don't review our cache mangement before 2.0 (an donly
in
> 2.1 for instance), this will mean that we may have similar problems
between
> 2.0 and 2.1. And I wouldn't like to have yet another default directory
name
> for 2.1. So maybe we should re consider cache mangement review for 2.0?
Or
> forget about such distinction? Or simply consider using .ivy2.1 for
> 2.1version (if necessary due to cache structure change). Or maybe we
> could find
> a way to preserve compatibility of cache (by using different file
names)?
> WDYT?
>
> Xavier
>
> --
> > Maarten
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Never miss an email again!
> > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
> > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
> Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
> http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
>


--
Gilles SCOKART







____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who
knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469




--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/

Reply via email to