I already changed it to Ant tasks. I had the same doubt as you had. But ant Task is also the title used inside the ant documention. So I think it is ok, even if you have some types also.
Ant+Ivy can be a nice as well. Gilles 2007/8/5, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Author: gscokart > > Date: Thu Aug 2 07:10:56 2007 > > New Revision: 562114 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=562114 > > Log: > > use a shorter title to have a cleaner layout > > > > Modified: > > incubator/ivy/core/trunk/doc/toc.json > > > > Modified: incubator/ivy/core/trunk/doc/toc.json > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ivy/core/trunk/doc/toc.json?view=diff&rev=562114&r1=562113&r2=562114 > > > > ============================================================================== > > --- incubator/ivy/core/trunk/doc/toc.json (original) > > +++ incubator/ivy/core/trunk/doc/toc.json Thu Aug 2 07:10:56 2007 > > @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ > > }, > > { > > "id":"ant", > > - "title":"Using from Ant", > > + "title":"Ant Targets", > > > I don't think Ant targets is a good title. "Ant tasks" would be better, but > we don't provide only tasks now. "Ant types" would be maybe more correct but > not easy to understand for users. Maybe simply "Ant+Ivy" would be generic > and descriptive enough? > > Xavier > > "children": [ > > { > > "id":"use/artifactproperty", > > > > > > > > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ > http://www.xoocode.org/ > -- Gilles SCOKART
