On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:04:24 +0100 "Xavier Hanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Niklas Matthies > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed 2008-02-27 at 16:50h, Xavier Hanin wrote on ivy-user: > > : > > > Personnally I was just thinking about something very similar to > > > maven dependency management feature, with slight adaptation to > > > Ivy syntax. > > > > > > Something like: > > > <ivy-module version="2.0"> > > > <info ... /> > > > <dependencies> > > > </dependencies> > > > <dependencyManagement> > > > <dependency org="foo" name="bar" rev="1.0" /> > > > </dependencyManagement> > > > </ivy-module> > > > > How would this be different from a regular dependency with a "force" > > attribute? > > It's different only in concept: I don't like having to add a > dependency declaration when your module don't actually depend on > something. Later you can wonder why you have this dependency. That's > why we have the conflicts section in Ivy files. So I think this kind > of dependency version overloading deserves a new feature. > Full ACK. harry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
