On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:08 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why the filesystem resolver needs both the ivy and > artifact pattern entries to be defined? > > If I define only one I get an exception - is this what would be > expected?
Defining only artifact pattern should definitely be allowed. Defining only ivy pattern makes sense in a dual resolver only. Not sure if we can detect this properly, but we could fail later. Hence I agree Ivy should allow to define only one kind of pattern on resolvers. Could you open an improvement issue with detailed message you get? Xavier > > > thanks > > paul > > > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
