On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Buck, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Woohoo! That's Fantastic Xavier. Glad to ear you love it :-) > I am looking forward to cleaning up the > workarounds I put in place. > > I will provide any feedback as I work through trying this. Great! Beta is here for that: feedback before changes go final.
Xavier > > Thanks so much. > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:50 PM > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Can Caches Be Associated with Specific Resolvers? > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Buck, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was looking over the details of IVY 2 Beta 2 the other day and I > > had one question. > > > > It looks like one can set up caches that have affinity to particular > > > types of files, or patterns. On the other hand, can one define a > > specific cache per resolver regardless of pattern (this would seem to > > be the other dimension people would consider) ? > Actually, the former is not possible (pattern affinity) but the latter > is... it seems we "just" forgot to update the documentation on the > resolvers page: with beta 2 all resolvers have a cache attribute, which > allow to give the name of the cache instance to associate with the > resolver. With pluggable caches, it's a great improvement to Ivy > flexibility! > > Xavier > > > > > Bob > > > > > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/ > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
