On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Niklas Matthies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri 2008-03-28 at 17:24h, Xavier Hanin wrote on ivy-user: > > FYI, I've just checked in code which uses the proposed syntax. Here's an > > extract of an ivy file used in ivy file parsing test: > > <dependencies> > > [...] > > <dependency org="yourorg" name="yourmodule11" rev="11.1" > conf="*->@"/> > > > > <hints> > > <exclude module="*servlet*" matcher="glob" conf="myconf1" /> > > <exclude org="acme" module="test" artifact="test" > type="source" ext="jar" /> > > <conflict org="yourorg" module=".*" matcher="regexp" > manager="all" /> > > <conflict org="theirorg" module="theirmodule1" rev="1.0, 1.1 > "/> > > <override org="yourorg" module=".*1" matcher="regexp" > branch="BRANCH" rev="1.0" /> > > </hints> > > </dependencies> > : > > This is still open to discussion, if you have better ideas for the > syntax, > > or a better name than 'hints', please give feedback before we cut next > > release. > > How about just placing these elements directly under <dependencies>? > This would read pretty natural to me. It would at least avoid to find a better word than "hints" :-) I'm fine with putting them directly under dependencies. What do others think? Xavier > > > -- Niklas Matthies > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
