Could you create a JIRA issue for this? Please attach a reproducable test-case if possible.
Maarten ----- Original Message ---- From: "Brown, Carlton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:35:11 PM Subject: RE: Namespace problems Sorry to bring back a zombie thread... I'm still having this problem with the namespace issue in RC1. I did declare the to/from relationship in both directions as Xavier asked earlier, and it seems that namespace mapping still causes fatal error when transforming revision numbers. I was trying to use an install task, modeling the Ivy namespaces tutorial as much as possible, but changing the revision suffix -rc3 to -final3 instead of changing organisation from commons-.+ to apache like the example did. <namespace name="promote-rc"> <rule> <fromsystem> <src rev="(.+)-final(.+)"/> <dest rev="$r1-rc$r2"/> </fromsystem> <tosystem> <src rev="(.+)-rc(.+)"/> <dest rev="$r1-final$r2"/> </tosystem> </rule> </namespace> </namespaces> [ivy:install] local-staging: bad revision found in C:\ivy\artifact-repositories\local-staging\com\ccrt\ols\dynaweb\1.0.0-rc 3\ivy.xml: expected='1.0.0-rc3 found='1.0.0-final3' [ivy:install] [ivy:install] :: USE VERBOSE OR DEBUG MESSAGE LEVEL FOR MORE DETAILS BUILD FAILED c:\allworkspaces\ebiz-1.6-rmtest\ivy-template\ivy-common.xml:169: Problem happened while installing modules - see output for details at org.apache.ivy.ant.IvyInstall.doExecute(IvyInstall.java:113) at org.apache.ivy.ant.IvyTask.execute(IvyTask.java:277) at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:288) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor Impl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.java:1 05) at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:357) at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:385) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1329) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1298) at org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecut or.java:41) at org.eclipse.ant.internal.ui.antsupport.EclipseDefaultExecutor.executeTar gets(EclipseDefaultExecutor.java:32) at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1181) at org.eclipse.ant.internal.ui.antsupport.InternalAntRunner.run(InternalAnt Runner.java:423) at org.eclipse.ant.internal.ui.antsupport.InternalAntRunner.main(InternalAn tRunner.java:137) Total time: 1 second * I know the resulting transform would result in a nonsensical value of -finalN but that isn't important to this issue. -----Original Message----- From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 7:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Namespace problems On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Brown, Carlton < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to bump this topic one more time. After more testing using > static revision numbers, I am still not able to use Ivy namespaces to > map revision numbers between repositories. There's no problem with > organisations or modules. > > This time I used static revision numbers instead of expressions, in > order to guarantee an 1:1 relationship. For example, trying to map > rev=1.0.0.1 to rev=1.0.0-final. It kept failing with an error similar > to below, "inconsistent module descriptor". It claims it "found" a > revision of 1.0.0-final inside ivy-1.0.01.xml (which is NOT contained > in the file), although it expected a revision of 1.0.0.1 (which truly > IS in the ivy-1.0.0.1.xml file). > > So does namespace mapping actually work for revisions? Is there a > test case for this? I doubt we have a test case for this, and I've never heard people using namespaces for this, so I wouldn't be surprised if it's buggy. Just to be sure, in your last test (with static revision) did you provide the conversion rules in both ways (from and to system). Because I haven't checked the code, but I think currently Ivy relies on both rules to handle namespace properly. Xavier > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brown, Carlton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 1:52 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Namespace problems > > > > I'm getting errors I don't understand while using install with > > namespace and I'd appreciate any insight. > > > > Briefly, my intention is to copy foo-module-1.0.0.0 from an RC > > repository into a final repository with the version changed to 1.0.0 > > (truncating the final number). > > > > My rename rule looks like this: > > > > <rule> > > <fromsystem> > > <!-- Space holder, because although there will never be a > > fromsystem copy, Ivy still throws NPE if we don't include this xml > > element --> > > </fromsystem> > > <tosystem> > > <src rev="(.+)\.(.+)\.(.+)\.(.+)"/> > > > > <dest rev="$r1\.$r2\.$r3"/> > > > > </tosystem> > > </rule> > > > > First, a question... clearly, the <fromsystem> is required because I > > get a NullPointerException if it is not defined. > > But am I wrong to think that <fromsystem> is unnecessary if I know > > that I will never install > > *from* the system, always *to* it? > > > > Second, regarding the strange error: > > [ivy:install] ERROR: rc-fs: bad revision found in > > C:\artifact-repositories\rc-repo\myorg\foo-module\1.0.0.0\ivy.xml: > > expected='1.0.0.0 found='1.0.0' > > [ivy:install] java.text.ParseException: inconsistent module > > descriptor file found in > > 'C:\artifact-repositories\rc-repo\myorg\foo-module\1.0.0.0\ivy > > .xml': bad > > revision: expected='1.0.0.0' found='1.0.0'; > > > > I don't understand the reasons for this error, because naturally the > > original ivy file should not contain the modified revision number. > > Even more odd, it seems to me that the semantic sense of the error is > > reversed. The so-called 'expected' revision 1.0.0.0 is definitely > > found in the 1.0.0.0\ivy.xml file. The so-called 'found' revision of > > 1.0.0 is, of course, not found in that any file (since 1.0.0 is the > > new > > revision number to be installed). So basically I'm totally > > confused as > > to what went wrong. > > > > I'd really appreciate help understanding this, I beat my head > > against it > > for several hours and came no closer to understanding it. I emulated > > the tutorial as much as possible, but it seems I am having no luck. > > > > Thanks, > > Carlton > > > > > > > > <HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P> > > <P><STRONG> > > ==================================================== > > This message contains PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL information that > > is intended only for use by the named recipient. If you are not the > > named recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, or action based on > > the contents of this message is prohibited. In such case please > > notify us and destroy and delete all copies of this transmission. > > Thank you. > > ==================================================== > > </STRONG></P></BODY></HTML> > > > > ----------------------------------------- > ==================================================== > This message contains PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL information that is > intended only for use by the named recipient. If you are not the named > recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, or action based on the > contents of this message is prohibited. In such case please notify us > and destroy and delete all copies of this transmission. Thank you. > ==================================================== > -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
