Other people can correct me but I think normally you'd have a single repository but release and development versions of your artifacts.
Either way I find it odd to have developers publishing directly to the repository. That seems like something your build server should handle for you. Jtf On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, csanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure whats a good approach, ideally we'd have a release repo and a > development repo. > > Jeffrey Fredrick wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:29 PM, csanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> We are a team of about 20 I was hoping to have a publicly shared repo >>> where >>> all team members could publish their artifacts, maybe I'm taking the >>> wrong >>> approach ? >>> >> >> When you assemble a release are you going to use the artifacts in that >> repository or is that just for day-to-day use? -- http://blog.jeffreyfredrick.com
