Get lost Jeff. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jeff Glatz <[email protected]>wrote:
> interesting, since you work for Halliburton and they've stolen billions > of dollars, i suppose the US taxpayer would be footing that bill... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn Castrianni [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:26 PM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: RE: is ivy dead? > > > > I use ivy for my job and, therefore, any urgent issue or enhancement > > can be resolved by offering paid development from the company's budget > > to any of the ivy committers. I am sure any of the ivy committers > > would like to make some extra money. > > > > --- > > Shawn Castrianni > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:12 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: is ivy dead? > > > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > I understand your frustration. I have the same feeling when I report > > issues to some commercial products and never get a response. > > But please keep in mind that Ivy is not a commercial product. The > > developers of Ivy are not paid by Apache for their work on Ivy. This > > means we do fix some bugs, commit some new features when we have some > > free time to work on it. > > > > I can only speek for myself, but the last couple of months I didn't > had > > much free time left to work on Ivy. But I'm confident this will > improve > > in the near future... > > > > regards, > > Maarten > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Jim Newsham <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 12:58:48 AM > > Subject: Re: is ivy dead? > > > > > > I share the same frustration. It seems that bugs which were reported > > months > > ago have no assigned owner, no evaluation, and no activity... > > regardless of > > priority level. Maybe a more sensitive way of rephrasing the question > > is: > > Is ivy being actively developed and maintained? What is the > > development > > cycle? Are maintenance fixes being made to released versions? How > > quickly > > are bugs evaluated? How quickly can we expect a major bug to be > > fixed/released in a maintenance release? > > > > It's not that I feel a need to draw attention to the particular issues > > that > > I'm experiencing. I've learned to work around those. It's for the > > community's benefit. > > > > Jim > > > > The issues that I've run into are: retrieve with "sync" is broken > > (IVY-1044); cleancache sometimes does NOT clean the cache (IVY-1080). > > > > > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Alex Zhukov wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I opened a critical bug http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ > > > IVY-1087 on June 2, no reaction from developers. On June 15 I > > > increased the priority to Blocker, still no reaction from > > > developers. Can some one tell me if ivy project is dead or > > > developers are not interested in maintaining it any more? > > > > This is an open source project. Sometimes activity is high, sometimes > > not so high. Developers are on holidays or have a stressful time with > > their day time project. Whatever. > > > > And obviously, looking at the mailing list you are using, this project > > seems to be busy and far from dead. I can understand that it is > > sometimes frustrating that an important issue is not fixed. But I > > think it is not a nice style to play with the 'Is this project dead?' > > phrase to raise attention for an issue. This is mud-slinging. I think > > the fact that within the period of three weeks no one has commented on > > a certain issue does not justify this at all. > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential > and > > privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. > Any > > review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly > > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to > > receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the > > sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. > ######################################################################## > "This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this email is strictly > forbidden. If you have received this message in error, please reply to the > above sender notifying them of this error, and then kindly delete the > message." > ######################################################################## >
