On Thu 2009-08-27 at 22:40h, Niklas Matthies wrote on ivy-user: : > In the example given on [1] where confmappingoverride is set to true > > <dependency name="other-module" conf="conf1->other1;conf2->other2" /> > > when resolving conf2, is the result for other-module supposed to be > the configuration other2, or the union of other1 and other2?
If it is the latter, then in the case that the existing mapping is the default mapping conf1->conf1 and is not needed, as a workaround conf1 could be mapped to the empty set of configurations. My question: Is there a designated way to specify a mapping to the empty set, e.g. "conf1->" or maybe "conf1->!*", or something like "conf1->[false]*"? -- Niklas Matthies
