So, what do I do if the module is a 3rd party lib that hasn't defined the version? As a workaround, I've done this:
<exclude org="activation" name="activation"/> Since, somewhere else, an attempt is made by another 3rd party module to pull in "javax.activation/activation" which is cool. Is the only think I can do is use the workaround? -=david=- On 27 October 2010 10:34, Maarten Coene <maarten_co...@yahoo.com> wrote: > My guess is that it this module didn't define which version of activition is > needed. > If the revision isn't defined, ivy will default the revision to something like > "work...@local-hostname". > > Maarten > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: David Harrigan <dharri...@gmail.com> > To: ivy-user@ant.apache.org > Sent: Wed, October 27, 2010 10:59:40 AM > Subject: Strange IvyDE issue > > Hello, > > I'm having an issue with the latest version of IvyDE > (2.1.0.201008101807-RELEASE) in Eclipse. A module is attempting to > pull in activation, yet, I keep on getting this error: > > Some projects fail to be resolved > Impossible to resolve dependencies of fu#bar;0.1.0-SNAPSHOT > unresolved dependency: activation#activation;work...@pc-738: not found > > You can see that it's attempting to use my local machine, plus what is > this "working" attribute? > > It's causing the resolve to fail. > > Any ideas anyone? > > Thank you. > > -=david=- > > -- > I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9 > Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9 > > "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the > program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design > right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan. > > > > > -- I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9 Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9 "It is not usually until you've built and used a version of the program that you understand the issues well enough to get the design right." - Rob Pike, Brian Kernighan.
