No, I mean clean the Ivy cache just this once so that the new settings have
an opportunity to be recognized.

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Romain Pelisse <bela...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, but I would like to avoid cleaning the cache everytime. This idea is
> that Ivy just checks if some of the content of the cache has actually
> changed on the nexus repository. If I clean the cache everytime, I'll end
> up
> download everything, everytime.
>
> I just tried adding  checkmodified="true" on my resolver :
>
> <url name="my-resolver"
>      changingPattern="\*-SNAPSHOT"
>      changingMatcher="regexp"
>       checkmodified="true"
>      m2compatible="true">
>
> But sadly, as you suspected, Ivy does not treats pom.xml like ivy.xml in
> this regards...
>
>
> On 14 January 2011 17:21, Mitch Gitman <mgit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > First try clearing out your Ivy cache either with the ivy:cleancache task
> > or
> > manually, and then try again.
> >
> > One alternative is to specify checkmodified="true". That's presuming that
> > every time you publish a new snapshot, you're publishing the new pom with
> > it. I'm assuming that checkmodified="true" treats a pom.xml like an
> > ivy.xml,
> > but I don't know that for a fact.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Romain Pelisse <bela...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mitch,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply, I quickly tried it, but it does not seems to
> > trigger
> > > a new download when the snapshot change on Nexus. (the jars keep the
> same
> > > name and the same version, SNAPSHOT, but the timestamp change).
> > >
> > > Here is my settings:
> > >
> > > <url name="my-resolver"
> > >           changingPattern="\*-SNAPSHOT"
> > >           changingMatcher="regexp"
> > >           m2compatible="true">
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Did I miss something here or ?
> > >
> > > Also, you mentions there would be several way to do so, would mind
> > > elaborate
> > > (quickly) ? I think it would help me have a better grasp of Ivy (at
> least
> > > regarding how I use it).
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > >
>

Reply via email to