Yes, version ranges are perfectly ok. I didn't declare the proper latest strategy for the OBR resolver. Sorry for the confusion. Hlg
2012/4/28 Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org>: > > Le 27 avr. 2012 à 16:17, Hlg Tschr a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I played around with the experimental OSGI feature of the release >> candidate and got stuck with inter-bundle dependencies. I am using >> org.eclipse.emf.ecore rev 2.7.0.v20110605-0747, which gets resolved >> properly with a revision of 2.7.+ specified in the ivy file. Another >> dependent bundle specifies the required revision range as >> [2.7.0,3.0.0) in its manifest, which is not resolved. This may be >> related to the different notation of exclusive ranges in OSGI bundles >> and ivy files. I think the revision range should be converted to a >> range of [2.7.0,3.0.0[ to be resolved by ivy correctly? > > The version range should be correctly interpreted. If you interested in > reading some code, see VersionRange#toIvyRevision() [1]. Something else is > probably going wrong. > > Nicolas > > [1] > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/trunk/src/java/org/apache/ivy/osgi/util/VersionRange.java
