On 2/21/07, Blšták Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IvyDE is able to retrieve sources jar for (classes) jar and associate them together automatically. Sources and classes have to have the same artifact name and diferent types (default jar, source and javadoc ... yes, javadoc is also suppose to work). Currently there is a problem with using associated sources during debug (at least on Eclipse 3.2). Would be nice to if someone could fix it. Does anybody (Xavier) know why associated sources are available in development mode and not in debug mode (in Eclipse 3.2) ? I did not try older versions of Eclipse ...
No, I don't know, I don't see why there is such a difference. And I still lack of time to investigate on this issue... sorry Xavier Peter
________________________________ From: Gilles Scokart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: st 21. 2. 2007 10:26 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: IDEA project setup, or "Is there a standard way to deal with source and library artifacts?" I did that by adding the src and the javadoc artefacts into the list of artefacts in the ivy.xml, and I put some dedicated values in the type attribute ('src' and 'javadoc') in order to be able to retrieve them separately (for example, when I setup a path, I don't need them). Hope it help, Gilles > -----Original Message----- > From: Davide Baroncelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 21 février 2007 10:14 > To: [email protected] > Subject: IDEA project setup, or "Is there a standard way to deal with > source and library artifacts?" > > Hello, > as part of our build process (which is "ivy-ized" in that every subproject > declares its dependencies and its publications through ivy) we would like > to provide some sort of standard way of not only retrieving the > dependencies when building, but some sort of support for retrieving not > only the binary dependencies but also their source and javadoc packages. I > wondered what is the best way to deal with this in ivy: it seems there is > no explicit way to declare source and javadoc artifacts, is it there? > > Thanks, > Davide Baroncelli.
