xavier, i've already signed the apache contributor agreements and i've contributed code to other project. please feel free to check up on that. regardless, i attached the patch to the issue also (which makes more sense anyway).
i actually attached it twice, as the first time i didn't check the "grant license" checkbox, which i assume is relevant. thanks! Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/23/07, jeff wrote: > > *Xavier Hanin * wrote: > > > I don't know apache rules very well, but I would be surprised if you have > write access to our project. Indeed AFAIK commiting directly is considered > as being a commiter, which requires a vote in our PPMC. > > i suspect i have write access, because when i was approved for another > project, it was just "apache svn write access", and not specific to the > project. but ya, i don't really know how apache works it either. > > but anyway, i realize i am not a committer on this project so i won't even > try. i am attaching a patch file. would you mind applying it? i'd really > like this to be in the next release, so if you have a 2.x release branch, > could you put it there, as well as the trunk? For attaching the patch I'd prefer using the issue in JIRA. I don't know Apache rules well enough to be sure, but I know that there is no problem to apply patches when they are attached in JIRA with the checkbox saying it's a contribution. It's also easier to keep track of your contribution. And about the branch, 2.0 developments are occurring on the trunk, so no problem. Cheers, Xavier > thanks! > > ------------------------------ > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? > Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos. > > -- Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
