(not exactly rocket-science or a new thing, but another reminder that as 
defenders adapt, so do adversaries.. --rick)

Ransomware’s Dangerous New Trick Is Double-Encrypting Your Data

Even when you pay for a decryption key, your files may still be locked up by 
another strain of malware.

https://www.wired.com/story/ransomware-double-encryption/

Ransomware groups have always taken a more-is-more approach. If a victim pays a 
ransom and then goes back to business as usual—hit them again. Or don't just 
encrypt a target's systems; steal their data first, so you can threaten to leak 
it if they don't pay up. The latest escalation? Ransomware hackers who encrypt 
a victim's data twice at the same time.

Double-encryption attacks have happened before, usually stemming from two 
separate ransomware gangs compromising the same victim at the same time. But 
antivirus company Emsisoft says it is aware of dozens of incidents in which the 
same actor or group intentionally layers two types of ransomware on top of each 
other.

“The groups are constantly trying to work out which strategies are best, which 
net them the most money for the least amount of effort,” says Emsisoft threat 
analyst Brett Callow. “So in this approach you have a single actor deploying 
two types of ransomware. The victim decrypts their data and discovers it’s not 
actually decrypted at all.”

Some victims get two ransom notes at once, Callow says, meaning that the 
hackers want their victims to know about the double-encryption attack. In other 
cases, though, victims only see one ransom note and only find out about the 
second layer of encryption after they've paid to eliminate the first.

“Even in a standard single-encryption ransomware case, recovery is often an 
absolute nightmare,” Callow says. “But we are seeing this double-encryption 
tactic often enough that we feel it’s something organizations should be aware 
of when considering their response."

 Emsisoft has identified two distinct tactics. In the first, hackers encrypt 
data with ransomware A and then re-encrypt that data with ransomware B. The 
other path involves what Emsisoft calls a “side-by-side encryption” attack, in 
which attacks encrypt some of an organization's systems with ransomware A and 
others with ransomware B. In that case, data is only encrypted once, but a 
victim would need both decryption keys to unlock everything. The researchers 
also note that in this side-by-side scenario, attackers take steps to make the 
two distinct strains of ransomware look as similar as possible, so it's more 
difficult for incident responders to sort out what's going on. 

Ransomware gangs often operate on a revenue-sharing model, where one group 
builds and maintains a strain of ransomware and then rents its attack 
infrastructure to “affiliates” who carry out specific attacks. Callow says that 
double encryption fits into this model by allowing clients who want to launch 
attacks to negotiate splits with two gangs that can each provide a distinct 
strain of malware.

The question of whether to pay digital ransoms is a thorny and important one. 
And ransomware victims who choose to pay already need to be wary of the 
possibility that attackers won't actually supply a decryption key. But the rise 
of double encryption as a strategy raises the additional risk that a victim 
could pay, decrypt their files once, and then discover that they need to pay 
again for the second key. As a result, the threat of double encryption makes 
the ability to restore from backups more crucial than ever.

“Remediating from backups is a long complex process, but double encryption 
doesn’t complicate it further,” Callow says. “If you decide to rebuild from 
backups you're starting fresh, so it doesn't matter how many times the old data 
has been encrypted.”

For ransomware victims who don't have adequate backups in the first place or 
don't want to take the time to reconstruct their systems from scratch, double 
encryption attacks pose an additional threat. If fear of double encryption 
attacks makes victims less likely to pay across the board, though, attackers 
could back off of the new strategy.
-- 
Iw mailing list
[email protected]
http://sticklist.org/mailman/listinfo/iw_sticklist.org

Reply via email to