CIA’s Former Counterterrorism Chief for the Region: Afghanistan, Not An 
Intelligence Failure — Something Much Worse

https://www.justsecurity.org/77801/cias-former-counterterrorism-chief-for-the-region-afghanistan-not-an-intelligence-failure-something-much-worse/

While it’s certainly convenient to depict the shock and miscalculation U.S. 
officials claim over Afghanistan’s tragic, rapid fall to the Taliban as an 
intelligence failure, the reality is far worse. It’s a convenient deflection of 
responsibility for decisions taken owing to political and ideological 
considerations and provides a scapegoat for a policy decision that’s otherwise 
unable to offer a persuasive defense.

As CIA’s Counterterrorism Chief for South and Southwest Asia before my 2019 
retirement, I was responsible for assessments concerning Afghanistan prepared 
for former President Donald Trump. And as a volunteer with candidate Joe 
Biden’s counterterrorism working group, I consulted on these same issues. The 
decision Trump made, and Biden ratified, to rapidly withdraw U.S. forces came 
despite warnings projecting the outcome we’re now witnessing. And it was a path 
to which Trump and Biden allowed themselves to be held captive owing to the 
“ending Forever Wars” slogan they both embraced.

< - >

And in grading their own homework, the U.S. defense establishment only 
exacerbated the problem. While it’s little surprise the Department of Defense 
was unwilling to objectively evaluate the resolve and capacity of those they 
trained, equipped, and advised to resist a forthcoming Taliban offensive, their 
rose-colored depictions of achievement over 20 years flew in the face of 
reality, and was consistently challenged by the CIA’s more gloomy, albeit 
realistic projections.

As the CIA’s former regional counterterrorism chief, and then a private 
citizen, I advocated the need for the United States to remain in Afghanistan 
with a small, focused, counterterrorist presence but to adopt a dramatically 
different approach that did not require us being in the line of fire between 
rival national forces whose conflicts predated our intervention and will 
persist long after we’re gone. And while I have criticized the CIA and the 
intelligence community for various ills that require reform and contributed to 
the current circumstances, not least of which was a counterterrorism strategy 
that was arguably more damaging than the ill it sought to address, there was no 
intelligence failure by the agency in warning either Trump or Biden as to how 
events would play out. Operating in the shadows and “supporting the White 
House” will prevent the intelligence community from publicly defending itself. 
But the failure was not due to any lack of warning, but rather the hubris and 
political risk calculus of decision makers whose choices are too often made in 
their personal and political interest or with pre-committed policy choices, 
rather than influenced by (sometimes inconvenient) intelligence assessments and 
the full interests of the country.

Douglas London (@douglaslondon5) retired from the CIA in 2019 after 34 years as 
a Senior Operations Officer, Chief of Station and CIA’s Counterterrorism Chief 
for South and Southwest Asia. He teaches at Georgetown University, is a 
Non-resident fellow at the Middle East Institute, and is author of the book 
“The Recruiter,” concerning the CIA’s post 9/11 transformation.

-- 
Iw mailing list
[email protected]
http://sticklist.org/mailman/listinfo/iw_sticklist.org

Reply via email to