Hi Richard, Richard Kelly <[email protected]> wrote on 03/25/2009 07:07:41 AM:
> Hi again, > > I tried downgrading one of my systems to Java 1.3 > and built the Normalizer module of ICU4J with it. It > compiled fine and passed the Normalization tests > with no problems. As you mentioned, it's still quite > large, so I'll see if I can trim any other bits out. > > I agree that implementing the code as an XNI > component seems like a good idea so I'll write > that into my proposal. I'll try and get an initial > proposal with a basic design up in the next few > days and hopefully some kind people here > could help me improve it. Sounds good. I'll be looking out for it. If you have questions while you're putting it together feel free to ask. > thanks, > Richard > > > 2009/3/25 Michael Glavassevich <[email protected]>: > > > > I'm familiar with ICU4J. Was hoping if it's part of the solution that there > > might be some way to build a smaller jar which only contains the > > normalization support. The full jar is much larger than Xerces andI suspect > > most of the rest of it (e.g. the calendar services) we wouldn't use. Also > > curious if the Normalizer works on JDK 1.3. The docs [1] suggest that it > > might but also mentions that certain parts of ICU4J require JDK 1.4. We only > > recently voted to move to JDK 1.3 as the lowest level of JDK Xerces supports > > so hoping that ICU would work with that level. > > > > Have you had much thought about the overall design? I was thinking that the > > core support would live in an XNI component which could be shared between > > the parser pipeline and the DOM normalizer. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]
