[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732498#action_12732498
]
Johannes Koch commented on XERCESJ-1386:
----------------------------------------
Michael,
there's no requirement that a DOM be serializable; true. However, if a
super-type (NodeImpl) is serializable, then all sub-types of this type are also
serializable. But HTMLDocumentImpl, HTMLFormElementImpl, HTMLTableElementImpl
and TableSectionElementImpl (being sub-types of NodeImpl) are in fact not
serializable, because they have at least one non-serializable instance variable.
> Make HTMLCollectionImpl serializable
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: XERCESJ-1386
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1386
> Project: Xerces2-J
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: DOM (HTML)
> Affects Versions: 2.9.1
> Reporter: Johannes Koch
>
> All HTML element implementations extend org.apache.xerces.dom.NodeImpl, which
> implements java.io.Serializable. Some HTML element implementations contain
> instance variables of type org.apache.html.dom.HTMLCollectionImpl, which does
> not implement java.io.Serializable. So these HTML element implementations are
> in fact not serializable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
