Hi Michael,
   Thanks for sharing the release update for next version of Xerces.

I am quite excited to seeing the new Xerces-J release, available to
the community :) The timing of the release, as you wrote, looks great
to me :)

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Michael Glavassevich
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's about time we had a release. It's been over two years since the
> last one and during that time we've made significant progress in a number of
> areas:
>
> * XML Schema 1.1
> * JAXP 1.4
> * StAX event API (javax.xml.stream.events)
> * Element Traversal API [1] (org.w3c.dom.ElementTraversal)
> * Unicode normalization and normalization checking
>
> among other enhancements.
>
> Before we can do the Xerces release, we're first going to need to get out an
> official release of the JAXP 1.4 APIs from XML Commons. The coding has been
> done for awhile now. Just needs some documentation updates and a release
> candidate to vote on. If anyone would like to help out with that it would be
> appreciated. Hoping we could wrap that up and roll out releases from the
> other branches of XML Commons over the next month.
>
> Then we could start preparing the Xerces-J release. There's been a bit of
> chatter about having one in December. How does Friday, December 18th sound?
> Just before the end of the year.
>
> I'm thinking that we'd release two sets of binaries for 2.10.0, one built
> from the trunk and an experimental one from the XML Schema 1.1 branch so
> that the community could start to try out the new features: assertions,
> conditional type assessment, etc... with an understanding that things could
> change in the future along with the spec which isn't final yet.
>
> What do folks think?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ElementTraversal/
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: [email protected]
> E-mail: [email protected]



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to