Hi Rajeev,

Rajeev Sampath <[email protected]> wrote on 03/22/2010 12:14:04 PM:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>> Hi Rajeev,
>>
>> Only one of the projects from last year's idea list was completed
>> for GSoC 2009. All of the others are still available and have posted
>> to JIRA as potential ideas for this year. I just mentioned a few
>> other possibilities on the mailing list [1].
>>
> Thanks Michael for your reply. I had a serious look at the mail
> archives only after I posted the previous mail and noticed that
> there have been a few students already working on some of the ideas.
> I'll try to work on something avoiding overlappings.

As I mentioned to Udayanga you don't have to limit yourself to the project
ideas we've posted in JIRA so far. There are other areas in need of help
and just suggested a few more.

>> I have to admit I haven't heard of DSD before so can't really
>> comment on it. On a quick glance of the spec it looks like another
>> schema language though not immediately obvious to me how it
>> differentiates itself from the other existing ones.
>.
> Yes. It is another schema language. You can find a quick comparison
> of DSD with other schema languages here [1] [2].
> Given its extremely low popularity, there's no wonder that you
> haven't heard of it.  But on the other hand, one reason for its low
> popularity can be that almost no one has been seriously trying to
> implement it despite its advantages (it's been there for several
> years - almost for a decade I think). That's why I (and also
> Udayanga) wanted to know whether Xerces community has any plans to
> implement it.
>
> [1] http://www.brics.dk/~amoeller/XML/schemas/dsd-overview.html
> [2] http://www.brics.dk/DSD/
>
>
> Thanks.
> Rajeev

Thanks.>

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to