Hi Sanjaya, They are different XPointer schemes. Conceptually that is what an XPointerPart represents.
Perhaps some of the code could be shared but I think the parts specific to the element() and xpointer() schemes should be separated [1] into different classes. It's better OO design in my opinion. Thanks. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected]) E-mail: [email protected] Sanjaya Liyanage <[email protected]> wrote on 04/09/2010 01:37:21 PM: > Hi Michael, > Thank you for your comments on ElementSchemePointer class.But why a > new implementation of XPointerPart interface is required?Do you want > me to introduce any new abstract method there or is there any other > significant reason? > > Thank you > Sanjaya Liyanage > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
