Hi Mukul,

Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote on 07/05/2010 12:12:13 AM:

> Hi Michael,
>    Thanks for your reply.
>
> Could you please organize a poll on xalan-j-users lists, to get user
> community's opinion about this.

I'm sure you meant xerces-j-users ;-) And yes I can post a poll to the
list. Will try to do that some time this week.

> I think, one of the key questions about Xerces-J support for JDK 1.3
> is, that how many users are currently using Xerces-J with JDK 1.3? If
> any of Xerces-J users are currently using JDK 1.3, how long in future
> will they will continue to do so? Also would they be willing to
> migrate to JDK 1.4 to be able to use XML Schema 1.1?
>
> You could addd any more questions for the users!
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Michael Glavassevich
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Mukul,
> >
> > This may be okay (my intuition is that it is in 2010), but like any
other
> > proposed JDK upgrade we should be asking the users for their opinion
since
> > this would impact them. Note that at some point in the future when the
XML
> > Schema 1.1 implementation is stable it's going to get merged on tothe
trunk
> > so any higher JDK requirements it has are going to get pulled along for
the
> > ride on the main line.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Michael Glavassevich
> > XML Parser Development
> > IBM Toronto Lab
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> > E-mail: [email protected]
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Thanks.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to