Hi Ishan, These all sound like reasonable limitations at this stage.
Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Ishan Jayawardena <[email protected]> wrote on 07/26/2010 11:27:21 AM: > Hi, > I thought of writing about the things happening around the SCD project. > We are planing not to support the following features for now with the > current implementation plan. If you have any suggestion, please let us > know. > 1. the Schema Step. i.e. the SCP consisting of just '/'. [0] > According to the spec, we have to return the schema component for > '/', but since the current XSModel interface doesn't implement the > XSObject interface, we have no means to return the xsmodel as a schema > component. So, what we do right now is, just we return an empty list > for '/'. > > 2. the axis type, Extension axis [1] > 3. Extension Accessors [2] > 4. Fundamental Facets as schema components since still, they are not > exposed from any of Xerces's existing interfaces. > 5. the top level Identity Constraint Definitions components. But we do > support this type of components if they are not at top level. > 6. as I mentioned in an earlier discussion, we don't support Schema > 1.1 constructs. > > [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#section-path-interpret > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#NT-ExtensionAxis > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref/#NT-ExtensionAccessor > > Looking forward to your feedback. > Thanks. > > On 6/6/10, Michael Glavassevich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote on 06/04/2010 08:13:38 AM: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Ishan Jayawardena <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > 4 Iterator<Step> iterator() > >> > >> I think, we shouldn't use type-safe iterators (which I think, is newly > >> introduced in JDK 1.5) as Xerces supports JDK 1.3 min level as of now. > >> > >> So the above API could be changed to: > >> Iterator iterator() > >> > >> I feel, we could use JDK 1.4 for SCP, but I guess not 1.5 for Xerces > >> as of now :) > > > > That might be okay, but before making such a decision we need to consult > > with the community and hear their thoughts about the JDK support they need. > > In my opinion the user's needs should weigh higher than the convenience > > dropping older JDK support would have for developers / committers of > > Xerces. > > > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Mukul Gandhi > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > Thanks. > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > XML Parser Development > > IBM Toronto Lab > > E-mail: [email protected] > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > -- > Best Regards, > Ishan Jayawardena. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
