Hi Michael,
Thanks for the response.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:26 PM Michael Glavassevich
<mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> Everyone on the PMC has an equal voice. There was a really good message sent
> out by Rich Bowen a few weeks back on this subject that would be good for
> everyone to read if they haven't already. Anyone who would volunteer to make
> a new release would be welcome to do that. I certainly support you and anyone
> else who wants to do that, but that never requires approval from me.
>
> While on the subject of the PMC (and committers) it would be good to see some
> new additions. I know getting the existing PMC's attention for release votes
> these days can be challenging. I haven't had the bandwidth to approach anyone
> directly about their interests, but I think some of the more active
> participants around here might be good candidates, including those who
> benefit from Xerces indirectly through downstream projects like Xalan.
>
> For anyone else reading this response, that is an open invitation to you if
> you're interested.
I've a feeling that, XercesJ codebase available on the svn repos
currently, has substantial changes (for the applicable bug fixes and
improvements) accumulated approximately over the past one year since
the previous release.
As you've expressed your support, to make a new XercesJ release around
these days, I'll be happy to make a XercesJ 2.12.3 RC over the next
few days and make that available for review.
I'm also wondering whether, you have interest and bandwidth to make a
XercesJ 2.12.3 release. If that's not possible, within a reasonable
time frame, I'll be happy to make a XercesJ 2.12.3 RC.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-dev-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-dev-h...@xerces.apache.org
