Sent from palmtop; apologies for any auto-incorrections.
() | Text Mail Campaign
/\ | HTML mail is _evil_!
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
Hi Joe,
I think that, IBM's XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery engines were bundled
with Websphere XML feature pack.
I imagine, the above cited products are IBM's IP. Is it possible
somehow, IBM may donate its XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0 engines to Apache
(Xalan)? That could be a huge boost to XSLT technology.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:50 AM Joe Kesselman <kesh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I'd forgotten that Xalan was still 1.0; the IBM Research code derived
> from the Xalan base moved to 2.0 quite some time ago. (I think that got
> released as the Websphere XSLT/XQuery Compiler, or some such name, but
> was never widely promoted; there were some ugly things happening with
> headcount allocations at that time and we had other crises to handle.)
>
> Hmm.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
