Hi Jens, Thanks for your interest with XalanJ, and the vote. We've done few changes to few of the files, on the XalanJ related repos (the functional codebase repos, and the tests repos), after XalanJ RC6 was released. These file changes, were done as per review comments received for the XalanJ RC6 (primarily, by Gary). Gary has promised (you may read, one of his recent mails on this list), to review these pending changes that were done to the XalanJ files, after XalanJ RC6 was released. This means that, IMHO, this pending review needs to be closed (after feedback, from Gary I believe). After which, we could take next steps (likely a XalanJ 2.7.3 RC7), for the XalanJ 2.7.3 release.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:43 PM Annighöfer, Jens <jens.annighoe...@consist-itu.de> wrote: > > Hi all, hi Mukul, > > > > we‘ve tested the RC6 und didn’t find any bug. > > > > Thank’s a lot for your work, Mukul. And others. Here is our +1 for RC6. > > > > Best regards, Jens -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
