Hi Mukul,
No need to add another +1 vote. The rules of voting are clear on this point.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
If the 72 hours delay is done, and *no* -1 binding vote, and two +1
vote, all seems good for me to release the RC10.
Regards,
Bruno
On 29/03/2023 13:49, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:50 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it.
I can see that, the latest Xalan pmc records show that, following are
the currently eligible Xalan pmc members to cast binding votes for the
releases,
Bill Blough, Gary D. Gregory, Michael Glavassevich, Mukul Gandhi,
Roger Leigh
We've currently achieved two Xalan release binding votes for this RC as follows,
Gary Gregory,
Mukul Gandhi
We still need, at least one more Xalan release binding vote, to have
this XalanJ RC approved as a release.
I've just seen an email from, Apache's respected Rich Bowen, where he
says following,
"Every PMC member has an equal voice in deliberations. Each has one
vote. Each has veto power. Every vote weighs the same. It is not only
your right, but it is your obligation, to use that vote for the good
of the project and its users, not to appease the Chair, your employer,
or any other voice in the project."
I think, you and myself, have veto privileges to add one more +1 vote
for this XalanJ release.
I'm please, using my veto privilege, to add one more +1 vote for this
XalanJ release.
