Peter Hendry wrote: > > > Aleksander Slominski wrote: >> Peter Hendry wrote: >> >>> More efficient still would be to keep track of the last '<' and >>> whether it had a '/' after it - then allow returning past '>' if the >>> last '<' didn't have a '/' (confused? :-) ). >>> >> not sure if it is going to work with CDATA section (they can contain >> "unbalanced" XML) >> > > Why not? It is just an optimization. You can't have CDATA in an end > tag so you should not go past the '>' of the end tag whether there is > CDATA or not. CDATA section can have unbalanced XML so beynd tracking of < and /> you need to track CDATA sections as well AFACS.
best, alek > > Pete > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
