/Robert Houben/:
I ran extensive tests to see if clone would be faster (assumed it would, at first). I found that reparsing the original file (assuming it hadn't changed) was significantly faster than clone. If you have to serialize first, you might lose that advantage but I seem to recall it was significant.
Could the faster reparsing be because of the deferred DOM implementation - have you tried measuring: parse an XML file and perform a no-op traversing through the DOM, then measure clone the document and perform a no-op traversing through the cloned DOM?
-- Stanimir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
