On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Micah Koch <mk...@motive.com> wrote: > So I have a few questions, and one way or another there seems to be a bug. I > have a schema where > a.xsd includes b.xsd and c.xsd > b.xsd includes c.xsd
I don't think, this schema composition design is correct. Schema includes, ideally should not repeat. > 1) c.xsd gets included twice, is this allowed? >From XSD syntax point of view, this may be correct. But from design point of view, this is probably a bad practice. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org