Jeff, Jeffrey Sinclair <[email protected]> wrote on 06/16/2010 03:03:20 PM:
> Michael, > > I appreciate that you cannot please everyone but I would question > whether most users would prefer to have a smaller jar size versus having > debug symbols out of the box. Xerces does have a wide variety of use > cases which probably justifies a need to distribute without debug > symbols, however for server side applications which already have a ton > of jars, the slight increase in file size for Xerces is not significant. > Many of the core open source server side java libraries only ship with > debug symbols, not having Xerces in there as well is a big pain when > debugging. > > We can off course recompile, however I'd think the use-case for debug > symbols is stronger than that for jars without. I can see why there is > no need to rock the boat, so could I suggest a compromise by > distributing Xerces-J with the current jars and also providing the -g > jars? Sure, that's possible but something to consider for next release at this point. > Jeff > > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:51 -0400, Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > > > We had a discussion on the list last year [1]. Still the same story. > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/hnep3unggvhr5mbk > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > XML Parser Development > > IBM Toronto Lab > > E-mail: [email protected] > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote on 06/16/2010 > > 11:59:52 AM: > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > I could rebuilt Xerces myself but it would be great if Xerces were > > > compiled with debug information or offer a debug version of the jar > > > (s) along with the normal one. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Gary > > > > > > Gary Gregory > > > Senior Software Engineer > > > Seagull Software > > > email: [email protected] > > > email: [email protected] > > > www.seagullsoftware.com > > > > > > > > > From: Michael Glavassevich [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 15:23 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Xerces2j] version 2.10.0 > > > > > > FYI: I just started a release vote on the j-dev mailing list. If all > > > goes well with that Xerces-J 2.10.0 will be available this Friday, > > June 18th. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > > XML Parser Development > > > IBM Toronto Lab > > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > Michael Glavassevich <[email protected]> wrote on 06/10/2010 > > 11:02:00 AM: > > > > > > > The code is pretty much frozen at this point and is being tested > > now. > > > > > > > > Michael Glavassevich > > > > XML Parser Development > > > > IBM Toronto Lab > > > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > E-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > Jacob Kjome <[email protected]> wrote on 06/10/2010 01:34:39 AM: > > > > > > > > > Any estimates on a release date yet? > > > > > > > > > > Jake > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected], E-mail: [email protected]
