Michael, Do you have any plans to release a 2.12 to support the fifth edition then?
Curious, Thank you, Gary On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Michael Glavassevich <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > Hello, > > You are looking at XML 1.0 fifth edition which changed some of the rules > for allowable characters in XML names. > > The current version of Xerces-J supports XML 1.0 fourth edition and > behaves correctly with respect to the rules for XML names in that edition. > Older versions of Xerces-J support earlier editions of XML 1.0. > > Thanks. > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com > E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org > > "Manuel Jimenez" <mjime...@motionpoint.com> wrote on 10/07/2013 04:51:04 > PM: > >> According to the spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/ >> #sec-common-syn), xml names could start with the following: >> >> >> NameStartChar >> >> ::= >> >> ":" | [A-Z] | "_" | [a-z] | [#xC0-#xD6] | [#xD8-#xF6] | [#xF8-#x2FF] >> | [#x370-#x37D] | [#x37F-#x1FFF] | [#x200C-#x200D] | [#x2070-#x218F] >> | [#x2C00-#x2FEF] | [#x3001-#xD7FF] | [#xF900-#xFDCF] | [#xFDF0- >> #xFFFD] | [#x10000-#xEFFFF] >> >> >> The org.apache.xerces.util.XMLChar.isValidName() method for v2.0.2 >> returns false for the following characters: >> >> #x132, #x133, #x13f, #x140, #x149, #x17f, #x1c4, #x1c5, #x1c6, >> #x1c7, #x1c8, #x1c9, #x1ca, #x1cb, #x1cc, #x1f1, #x1f2, #x1f3, >> #x1f6, #x1f7, #x1f8, #x1f9, #x218, #x219, #x21a, #x21b, #x21c, >> #x21d, #x21e, #x21f, #x220, #x221, #x222, #x223, #x224, #x225, >> #x226, #x227, #x228, #x229, #x22a, #x22b, #x22c, #x22d, #x22e, >> #x22f, #x230, #x231, #x232, #x233, #x234, #x235, #x236, #x237, >> #x238, #x239, #x23a, #x23b, #x23c, #x23d, #x23e, #x23f, #x240, >> #x241, #x242, #x243, #x244, #x245, #x246, #x247, #x248, #x249, >> #x24a, #x24b, #x24c, #x24d, #x24e, #x24f, #x2a9, #x2aa, #x2ab, >> #x2ac, #x2ad, #x2ae, #x2af, #x2b0, #x2b1, #x2b2, #x2b3, #x2b4, >> #x2b5, #x2b6, #x2b7, #x2b8, #x2b9, #x2ba, #x2c2, #x2c3, #x2c4, >> #x2c5, #x2c6, #x2c7, #x2c8, #x2c9, #x2ca, #x2cb, #x2cc, #x2cd, >> #x2ce, #x2cf, #x2d0, #x2d1, #x2d2, #x2d3, #x2d4, #x2d5, #x2d6, >> #x2d7, #x2d8, #x2d9, #x2da, #x2db, #x2dc, #x2dd, #x2de, #x2df, >> #x2e0, #x2e1, #x2e2, #x2e3, #x2e4, #x2e5, #x2e6, #x2e7, #x2e8, >> #x2e9, #x2ea, #x2eb, #x2ec, #x2ed, #x2ee, #x2ef, #x2f0, #x2f1, >> #x2f2, #x2f3, #x2f4, #x2f5, #x2f6, #x2f7, #x2f8, #x2f9, #x2fa, >> #x2fb, #x2fc, #x2fd, #x2fe, #x2ff >> >> >> #x370, #x371, #x372, #x373, #x374, #x375, #x376, #x377, #x378, >> #x379, #x37a, #x37b, #x37c, #x37d >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I haven’t checked [#x37F-#x1FFF] | [#x200C-#x200D] | [#x2070-#x218F] >> | [#x2C00-#x2FEF] | [#x3001-#xD7FF] | [#xF900-#xFDCF] | [#xFDF0- >> #xFFFD] | [#x10000-#xEFFFF] yet… >> >> Was this intentional, was it fixed in newer versions? Please advise. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
