Here's my +1.

Thanks again Mukul.

Happy New Year!

Michael Glavassevich
XML Technologies and WAS Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org

Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote on 2020-01-01 04:50:28 AM:

> Hi all,
>    This is a revised voting request to the Xerces XML community, to 
> release Xerces-J 2.12.1 version, since we could fix few more bugs 
> after the first release candidate was prepared.
> 
> I request Xerces XML community to vote, to release Xerces-J 2.12.1 
> version. This shall be a minor Xerces-J release, when compared to 
> Xerces-J 2.12.0 release.
> 
> I've uploaded the release candidate for the Xerces-J 2.12.1 version,
> to [1] for review.
> 
> You could see that, there are two sets of packages, the main release
> built from the trunk [2] and a release built from the XML Schema 1.1
> development branch [3]. The change summary is available here [4] in 
> JIRA. 10 issues were resolved.
> 
> My Xerces PGP key, is available at the locations [5]. Both the 
> locations mentioned at [5] contain identical keys.
> 
> Test results have been ok, so I'd like to call an official vote now 
> on the release.
> 
> To start, here's my +1.
> 
> Great work everyone.
> 
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xerces/j/2.12.1/
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/java/tags/Xerces-J_2_12_1/
> [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xerces/java/tags/Xerces-J_2_12_1-
> xml-schema-1.1/
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=10520&styleName=Html&version=12346610
> [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xerces/java/trunk/KEYS,
>      https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xerces/java/branches/xml-
> schema-1.1-dev/KEYS
> 
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 10:04 AM Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I'm thinking to initiate a revised vote for 2.12.1 release, 
> during early January next year, due to an assumption that quite many
> people on Xerces lists might be on holiday during this time.
> 
> I hope this would be fine.
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi

Reply via email to