Dnia 2013-11-28, czw o godzinie 15:13 +0100, Reinhard Max pisze:
> IIRC because this was the only option on openSUSE at the time I first 
> built jabberd. Meanwhile openSUSE also has gsasl packages, but Cyrus 
> still seems to be the default choice.

So there is no reason really to keep this rotting code in the codebase
anymore. :-)


> Would using gsasl have any advantages for my jabberd packages besides 
> the fact that the Cyrus code in jabberd2 is unsupported/deprecated?

CysusSASL installation is heavily deployment dependent.
It is considered a system service rather than a standalone library.
i.e. in Redhat/Centos system its deployment is customized to the point
it was unusable for jabberd2 at all - thus I introduced GnuSASL.

Since then GnuSASL reached 1.0, caught-up and exceeded with features.
Yet another reason to remove unmaintained CyrusSASL backend.
So i will do just that.



Reply via email to