On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:49:30AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-04-14, 06:27 GMT, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:19:45AM -0700, John Oliver wrote:
> >> 1) Is this project the 'jabberd' that's available in EPEL?
> >
> > I can answer that one. jabberd in EPEL is jabberd2. As it is EPEL it
> > will not see as many updates as the upstream package
> I agree that I would keep EPEL-6 (or even EPEL-5) untouched just 
> with possible security patches, but it seems to me that rebase 
> in EPEL-7 would not be the worst idea. What do you think? I am 
> willing to help with patching.
> Do we know what is the upgrade story? Does the latest jabberd2 
> just takes over the original configuration?

In the configuration I am running jabberd2 on Fedora I did not have many
(maybe any) upgrading the last few versions. EPEL-7 would be an upgrade
from 2.3.2 to 2.3.6. It probably depends on the installation and which
backends are used if the upgrade. Looking at


it seems upgrading from 2.3.4 to 2.3.5 can require database changes. Not
sure how to handle this. But we can try.


Reply via email to