Dear Stefan,
This is interesting to hear as we are discussing sort options in
JabRef's preferences, at the fourth option ("File sorting"), you can
choose different sorting models. When reading that you use biber to
sort entries, I think, we can remove that configuration completely
from JabRef, can't we?
The discussion is ongoing at https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/180
Do you see some error messages such as "bad format"? - Then it might
happen around
net.sf.jabref.migrations.VersionHandling.Version2_3.fromString(Vector<String>,
BibtexDatabase, int)
or maybe in net.sf.jabref.importer.fileformat.BibtexParser.parse()
(Just as internal hints)
Could you provide us a minimal example for testing?
Cheers,
Oliver
2015-10-20 22:45 GMT+02:00 Stefan Björk <[email protected]>:
> I'm trying to use biber as a BibTeX pretty-printer. At first, this was
> doomed to fail because biber simply removes all @comment entries. Today,
> Philip Kime fixed that, and I am eternally grateful for that. However, this
> still breaks parsing of the JabRef groups tree, probably because newlines
> are removed from the @comment fields.
>
> Do parsing of the JabRef group tree really depend on newlines?
>
> See https://github.com/plk/biber/issues/86.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jabref-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jabref-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jabref-users
