Good! I'll do that next On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Arthur Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:38 AM, William Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I think we might as well have it both last and first, but not both. >> > > Did you mean, it could be in the first position *or* the last position, but > not both at the same time (which wouldn't really make sense anyway)? If > that's the case, I'm all for that. > > > _______________________________________________ > Jabsorb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.jabsorb.org/mailman/listinfo/jabsorb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Jabsorb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.jabsorb.org/mailman/listinfo/jabsorb-dev
