On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Brantley Hobbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Arthur Blake wrote: > > No news currently. I have so many things on my stack above that, it's > > not even funny... > > My plan was to simply repackage it and create a new project just for > > the demo, in order to prevent any possiblity of tainting the jabsorb > > license- if you really want the demo code, just go back far enough in > > the SVN history to the time before when I deleted it. It will be > > essentially the same as that... > > > > I can definitely relate to that. > > As it turns out, the proxy code still available from your original post > in the ExtJS forums was all I needed. It all works like a champ now. > IIRC, you licensed that particular bit with the MIT-X11 license, right? > > Thanks! > Brantley > Yes, with the disclaimer that it doesn't violate any other licenses-- the licensing in ExtJS is so confusing, it's hard to tell. I wrote all that code when ExtJS was supposedly under LGPL (and commercial dual license) thinking it would fall under the LGPL. Later, at one point they said that this particular licensing that they had was not even valid, leaving me and many other users really confused.) So, this code is derived from LGPL code... so maybe technically I'm not allowed to license it under MIT... It's such a small piece of code that just glues the two libraries together I don't think anyone will fuss, but beware because IANAL!
_______________________________________________ Jabsorb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.jabsorb.org/mailman/listinfo/jabsorb-dev
