Hi serge
Serge Huber wrote:
I was away for 3 weeks at the army so sorry for the late reply.
It's probably my non native english skills betraying me but I'm curious,
is it some kind of expression or are you fighting a war in your spare
time? ;)
The RMI-cluster solution is interesting, but I worry about
connection/disconnection problems. The full database implementation
causes performance problems, especially for binary data. Basically what
this means is that we are implementing some sort of clustered
file-system, that supports transactions and is as high-performance as
possible.
I didn't mean jcr-rmi could be used to scale jackrabbit horizontally. I
meant that jcr-rmi could be used in a j2ee cluster scenario to access a
single instance of jackrabbit, I'm thinking of something like ...
Box1. App Server Box2. App Server2
jcr-rmi client jcr-rmi client
---------------- ---------------
\ /
\ /
----------------
BOX3. jackrabbit
jcr-rmi server
best regards,
edgar
Regards,
Serge Huber.
