On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:05:38PM +0200, David Nuescheler wrote: > hi eugeny, > > the problem with performance metrics is that there are many aspects > of performance. i think your description goes more into the direction > of scalability. we tested several millions of items of real-life data and > depending on the persistence manager used we have noticed little to > no performance degradation. > > the good news about a "standards based" approach is that you can > develop your cms based on jcr (aka jsr-170) without having a direct > ties to jackrabbit. > > this means that if you have a customer that outgrows the scalability > of jackrabbit (which should not happen with a couple hundred thousand > items) that particular customer can just simply drop-in a commercial > repository instead of jackrabbit, without changing any of your application > code. > > does that help?
Yes, definitely! > since the performance question is amongst the most popular, > maybe we should start publishing performance and scalability metrics > on the jackrabbit website? anybody? It will be great, so I vote "yes" :) -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky
