Hi, On 1/3/06, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently JCR-RMI has its own implementations of the Value and > ValueFactory interfaces. How about reusing the implementations of the > "jackrabbit-commons". This might prevent needless server-side value > copying and would also solve the current issue we have with the Date > value, which does not really support ISO806 in its full breadth.
Good point. I'm not sure if the standard Jackrabbit ValueFactory produces network-safe Values. In any case we should probably better align the codebases. I'll take a look at this. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
