hi mark On 1/11/06, Mark Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still getting my bearings with jackrabbit so please bear with me. > > > > I'm confused on defining node types. I see in the doc on the site that > there is a special notation for defining node types (CND). I also see in > the project the file > 'applications/test/repository/nodetypes/custom_nodetypes.xml' that is > obviously based on the XML notation and not the CND notation. The site > makes reference to the fact that the XML notation is the 'Old Configuration > Notation'. > > > > A few questions: > > - Is acceptable to use either?
regarding custom_nodetypes.xml: see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/2314 use the api or use CND. cheers stefan > > - Is there a schema/DTD for the XML notation? > > - Other than being less verbose than the XML notation, what advantages does > the CND notation offer? (I suspect the notation was the subject of much > debate before I stumbled onto jackrabbit.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark Thompson > > > > >
