Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
The issue JCR-215 proposes to use the SLF4J logging facade in
Jackrabbit instead of directly using log4j. The issue has been on hold
waiting for a stable version of SLF4J.
SLF4J is getting very close to a 1.0 release (now in release candidate
5), so I'm thinking that we might perhaps want to make the
log4j->slf4j switch before the 1.0 release. This would avoid the
trouble of changing the logging framework between future Jackrabbit
releases.
Unless anyone objects, I'll tag JCR-215 for the 1.0 release and
prepare for making the switch once SLF4J 1.0 is out.
+1
--
Stefano.
