Hi All,

        Thanks for your response.
        
        I carried out some tests with 50000 nodes (small nodes with 3
properties), i create this in 25 minutes and my store weigh 2.5Go.

        And when i execute a simple query is still long : ~5 minutes.

        I applied your suggestion about document order here : 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<Repository>
    <FileSystem
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.local.LocalFileSystem">
        <param name="path" value="${rep.home}/repository"/>
                <param name="persistent" value="true"/>
    </FileSystem>    
    <Security appName="Jackrabbit">
        <AccessManager
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.security.SimpleAccessManager"/>
        <LoginModule
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.security.SimpleLoginModule">
           <param name="anonymousId" value="anonymous"/>
        </LoginModule>
    </Security>
    <Workspaces rootPath="${rep.home}/workspaces"
defaultWorkspace="default"/>
            <Workspace name="${wsp.name}">
                        <FileSystem
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.local.LocalFileSystem">
                        <param name="path" value="${wsp.home}"/>
                </FileSystem>        
                    <PersistenceManager
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.obj.ObjectPersistenceManager"/>
            <SearchIndex
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex">
                    <param name="path"
value="${wsp.home}/index"/>                                         
                    <param name="autoRepair" value="false"/>
                    <param name="respectDocumentOrder" value="false"/>
                </SearchIndex>          
            </Workspace>
            <Versioning rootPath="${rep.home}/version">
                        <FileSystem
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.fs.local.LocalFileSystem">
                                <param name="path" value="${rep.home}/version"/>
                        </FileSystem>          
                <PersistenceManager
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.state.obj.ObjectPersistenceManager"/>         
               
                </Versioning>
</Repository>

        And i use suversion version, i activated debug mode when i launched my
simple query : 

DEBUG main org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.QueryImpl - Executing
query: 
+ Root node
+ Select properties: *
  + PathQueryNode
    + LocationStepQueryNode:  NodeTest={} Descendants=false Index=NONE
    + LocationStepQueryNode:  NodeTest=* Descendants=true Index=NONE
      + AndQueryNode
        + NodeTypeQueryNode:
Prop={http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0}primaryType
Value={http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0}unstructured
        + AndQueryNode
          + RelationQueryNode: Op: LIKE Prop={}email Type=STRING Value=a
%

DEBUG main org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.AbstractIndex -
merging segments _0 (1 docs) into _1 (1 docs)
DEBUG main org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.AbstractIndex -
closing IndexWriter.
INFO main org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.DocNumberCache -
size=60/1024, #accesses=1001, #hits=941, #misses=60, cacheRatio=95%
DEBUG Timer-2 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex -
Flushing index after being idle for 3615 ms.
DEBUG Timer-2 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
index added: name=_ii, numDocs=1
DEBUG Timer-2 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex -
Committed in-memory index in 2ms.
DEBUG IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.AbstractIndex
- merging segments _0 (8416 docs) into _1 (8416 docs)
INFO IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
merged 8416 documents in 4206 ms into _ih.
DEBUG IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
replace indexes
DEBUG IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.AbstractIndex
- closing IndexWriter.
DEBUG IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
index added: name=_ih, numDocs=8416
DEBUG Timer-2 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.MultiIndex -
Flushing index after being idle for 3339 ms.
DEBUG main
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.DocOrderNodeIteratorImpl - 1537
node(s) ordered in 331882 ms
INFO main fr.openmodel.cms.imports.process.TestImportMgtProcess -
testInsert 3 contentUnits.size()=1537
INFO Thread-4
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.ObservationManagerFactory -
Notification of EventListeners stopped.
DEBUG Thread-4 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
dispose IndexMerger
INFO IndexMerger org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
IndexMerger terminated
DEBUG Thread-4 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
quit sent
DEBUG Thread-4 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
IndexMerger thread stopped
DEBUG Thread-4 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.IndexMerger -
merge queue size: 0
INFO Thread-4 org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex -
Index closed: /opt/jackrabbit/repotest/workspaces/default/index
DEBUG Thread-4
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.ObservationManagerImpl - removing
EventListener: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DEBUG Thread-4
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.ObservationManagerImpl - removing
EventListener: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DEBUG Thread-4
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.observation.ObservationManagerImpl - removing
EventListener: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Can you help me please ?

Thanks for your help,

Best Regards,
Jérôme.


Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 12:08 +0100, Marcel Reutegger a écrit :
> try disabling document order on query results:
> 
> <SearchIndex
> class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex">
>      [...]
>      <param name="respectDocumentOrder" value="false"/>
> 
> </SearchIndex>
> 
> 
> information about document order is not stored in the index, that mean 
> if you have a large result set, the query handler has to load nodes from 
> storage, which is expensive compared to index lookups.
> 
> regards
>   marcel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Reply via email to